t > MIC–MIC relationship for four different dosing regimens of amoxycillin. 0000005220 00000 n
(•), 500 mg q6h; (▪), 500 mg q8h; (♦), 875 mg q8h; (□), 875 mg q12h. Recently, a new formulation was introduced, containing 875 mg amoxycillin instead of 500 mg. One of the advantages of this would be that doses of the drug could be administered less frequently. 0000030295 00000 n
The second problem is the MIC itself. 1 This relationship has been shown both in in vitro pharmacokinetic models and numerous animal experiments, and the analysis of clinical trials in humans seems to confirm this. 0000018907 00000 n
We conclude that to compare various dosing regimens of one or more drugs, a figure showing the t > MIC–MIC relationship would be most helpful, and that the tools to reveal such relationships are now readily available. Is is the lower the MIC the better? They are a tremendously important guide toward choosing the appropriate antibiotic. 0000003074 00000 n
• The choice of antibiotic should be based on the MIC number, the site of infection and an antibiotic’s breakpoint. The absorption case is complicated further by two components of the concentration–time curve, one ascending and one descending. • The choice of antibiotic should not be based on the MIC alone but on several other criteria. 0000000956 00000 n
In some recent papers, this approach has been used to compare dosage regimens of the same drug,3,4 or of different drugs.3,5 However, the disadvantage in these publications is that comparisons are made at one concentration only, or at two at the most, which does not furnish a full view of the subject. The major disadvantage of this approach, and perhaps one of the reasons that an illustration such as that shown in the Figure has not been used widely, is that computation of the t > MIC is difficult as soon as calculations involve more than one constant, as is the case in two-compartment models (one for distribution and one for elimination), or drugs given orally (one for absorption and one for elimination). Clinical breakpoints for some agents commonly used in animals are listed in Tables 2 to 4. ¹M%I´Æ*F´. 0000024147 00000 n
h�b```"mV] ��e9.�W`pZTVg��/��P�v{�*�����. Correspondence address. Traditional methods are still widely used, there are also many automated antimicrobial susceptibility tests (AST) that return results in faster times. For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription. 0000007925 00000 n
Finding new antimicrobial drugs requires researchers, pharmaceutical, and biotech companies to invest in new technology and discover new sources for antibiotic development. These derivations are explicit, which implies that either the various dosing regimens have to be simulated and the t > MIC calculated by hand from the resulting concentration–time relationship, which is a tedious undertaking, or that the use of a numerical approach to solve the equations is necessary. Antibiotics are further divided into bactericidal antibiotics (which kill bacteria) and bacteriostatic antibiotics (which stop them from growing). section.) What is an MIC? 0000030409 00000 n
antibiotic 1 # < suscpetible. 0000006960 00000 n
Consider safety, ease of use and cost when determining the optimum antibiotic. The first is that, although there is a good relationship between t > MIC and effect, there is no universal agreement on the duration of this time. The aim is to measure the susceptibility of an isolate to a range of antimicrobials and find the MIC. 0000012892 00000 n
antibiotic 3 # < resistant. 0000010935 00000 n
This would establish a general pic-ture, and enable anyone to draw their own conclusions regarding the comparability of different dosing regimens. 0000023913 00000 n
Empirical antibiotic guidelines are established by answering many of the questions below. 4. antibiotic 4 # > resistant. The actual MIC given on the report can be compared to the clinical 0000003981 00000 n
Johan W. Mouton, Nieko Punt, Use of the t > MIC to choose between different dosing regimens of β-lactam antibiotics, Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, Volume 47, Issue 4, April 2001, Pages 500–501, https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/47.4.500. 0000011535 00000 n
0000030332 00000 n
Data for smulation were taken from Woodnutt & Berry (1999).4 The t > MIC was calculated as a percentage of the dosing interval at steady state, assuming a bioavailability of 80%. If a proper comparison is to be made between different regimens, the t > MIC should be calculated. A. T. M.M. 0000003868 00000 n
0000005674 00000 n
0000012309 00000 n
Tel: +31-24-3657514; Fax: +31-24-3657516; E-mail:
[email protected], Mouton, J. W., Touw, D. J., Horrevorts, A. M. & Vinks, A. • The choice of antibiotic should be based on the MIC number, the site of infection, and an antibiotic’s breakpoint. Should it be 40%, 70% or 100% of a dosing interval? In this way, the break point, titer, or minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of the antibiotic that prevents growth of the microorganism at the site of infection can be determined. An example is shown in the Figure for various dosing regimens of co-amoxiclav. In general, larger zones correlate with smaller minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of antibiotic for that bacteria. Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC)/Breakpoint guidelines differ between the CLSI and EUCAST. Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST). It is essential to understand the relevance of these questions and the effect of the answers. • An MIC number for one antibiotic CANNOT be compared to the MIC number for another antibiotic. 0000004640 00000 n
0000008008 00000 n
0000001297 00000 n
Streeklaboratorium Medische Microbiologie, Canisius Wilhelmina Ziekenhuis Nijmegen, Weg door Jonkerbos 100, 6532 sz Nijmegen, The Netherlands. 0000008796 00000 n
A more proper approach, we propose, would be to compare the t > MIC for the various dosing regimens over the whole range of MICs. For some infections, limiting bacterial growth is sufficient enough to allow the body’s natural defenses to fully eradicate the bacteria. • The attached tables will aid in MIC interpretation and antibiotic selection. 0000002439 00000 n
64 0 obj
<>
endobj
xref
trailer
<<283E56A84B1244CBA1ACA6F763F30094>]/Prev 175512>>
startxref
0
%%EOF
96 0 obj
<>stream
Sir, The major pharmacodynamic index correlating with in vitro and in vivo efficacy has been shown to be the time the concentration of an antibiotic remains above the MIC, or in short, the t > MIC. If various dosage regimens of one drug, or even different drugs, are compared with each other with respect to the t > MIC, at which concentration should this be done? You can end up with three possibilities: 1. 64 33
0000003504 00000 n
0000016021 00000 n
%PDF-1.4
%����
Consider safety, ease of use, and cost when determining the optimum antibiotic. Various claims have been made of equal or almost equal t > MICs at various concentrations (MICs),6 but an overall picture is generally unavailable. 0000030738 00000 n
0000007481 00000 n
The major pharmacodynamic index correlating with in vitro and in vivo efficacy has been shown to be the time the concentration of an antibiotic remains above the MIC, or in short, the t > MIC.1 This relationship has been shown both in in vitro pharmacokinetic models and numerous animal experiments, and the analysis of clinical trials in humans seems to confirm this.2 This relationship between t > MIC and efficacy is beginning to be used to define or compare dosage regimens in humans. However, there are three major problems with this approach. 0000000016 00000 n
antibiotic, and the growth of the microorganism is monitored as a change in turbidity. To obtain the t > MIC relationships shown in the Figure, we used an Excel program that was developed for this specific purpose and readily shows the t > MIC–MIC relationship for various dosing regimens. Relying on empirical antibiotic guidelines without knowing why or how these guidelines are produced can be dangerous and is … (See the “How are MICs used?” section.) (See the "How Are MICs Used?" Finally, the issue on which we will focus in more detail is the calculation of the t > MIC for different dosage regimens. antibiotic 2 # > susceptible. 0000009547 00000 n
0000024024 00000 n
0000006584 00000 n
øN³ñPÕ½®€à°ªÀ� c@ FÙ°,ãânp11ô÷2“6èÁŸ±�ßkİ‘Z%ëÇşc4‘ˆDãIø8Ähá�òxú ŠX0ÂBÖ Proposed mechanisms to circumvent antimicrobial resistance range from exploring the list of resistance genes to antibody-based therapy and vaccines. 0000010369 00000 n
It furthers the University's objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide, This PDF is available to Subscribers Only. (See the “antibiotic selection” section). 0000001408 00000 n
Search for other works by this author on: © 2001 The British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, Improvement of HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders after antiretroviral therapy intensification: the Neuro+3 study, Inhibition of SARS-CoV-2 in Vero cell cultures by peptide-conjugated morpholino oligomers, About the Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, Receive exclusive offers and updates from Oxford Academic, About Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, Copyright © 2020 British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. Differences and absolute values of t > MIC would be readily visible. How do I select the antimicrobial agent most likely to be effective based on the MIC data provided? • An MIC number for one antibiotic CANNOT be compared to the MIC number for another antibiotic. Now I know that I'm not going to use a drug that is resistant, but when I'm given multiple susceptible choices, how do I choose between them? You end up with S which means Susceptible which means it … (, Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford.